ArticleMemory & cognition2026
Imagine this: Memories of fiction are used in mental simulations in the absence of lived experience.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Memories of events from fictional sources (e.g., scenes from movies or novels) share many properties with memories of lived experiences (Yang et al., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151 (5), 1089, 2022). Here we test whether memories of fictional events can serve a similar function to personal memories, serving as the building blocks for simulations of novel scenarios. Across two studies, participants imagined themselves in future scenarios, rated the phenomenological qualities of each simulation (e.g., visual properties), and then identified the sources (e.g., fiction, lived experience) used to generate their simulations. Study 1 (N = 208) focused on people's simulations of a pandemic as a function of whether they had personally experienced the COVID-19 lockdown yet. Participants tested prior to lockdown reported drawing on fictional sources when simulating a pandemic scenario; in contrast, participants tested after lockdown began drew on their own lived experiences when simulating. Study 2 (N = 248) replicated these results using a diverse set of scenarios (e.g., being stuck in an elevator) selected to elicit different levels of prior experience across participants. Again, fictional memories were relied upon when simulating in the absence of lived experience. The results suggest that fictional and personally experienced memories can serve similar functions. Theoretically, the results are consistent with arguments to broaden frameworks of autobiographical memory to include memories of fictional events, in the same way that false memories and vicarious memories are considered to be types of autobiographical memories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41055888What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.