ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2025
Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making in Anorexia Nervosa.
Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Brain network-based stratification of mental health disorders: design and cohort description of the STRATIFY and ESTRA studies.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewWe review recent literature on instrumental reinforcement learning involving decision-making in anorexia nervosa (AN) to understand mechanisms underlying symptoms of AN, such as rigid pursuit of weight loss despite negative consequences. RECENT
findingsRelatively consistent findings indicate worse reward- and punishment-based feedback learning in the ill and weight-recovered states that is not observed in remitted samples. Initial studies suggest decreased goal-directed learning in AN, although this needs replication. Similarly, research is needed to clarify mixed findings related to learning under changing rules and the role of fear versus avoidance learning in AN. Growing evidence supports altered reinforcement learning in AN. Most studies examined the impact of outcome valence, changing rules, and habitual vs goal-directed control on learning. Computational modeling approaches can provide nuanced characterization of cognitive processes related to reinforcement learning and contribute to precision medicine efforts that may improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.