Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41055866›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2025

Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making in Anorexia Nervosa.

Christina E Wierenga, Carina S Brown, Erin E Reilly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christina E WierengaUniversity of California San Diego, Department of Psychiatry, San Diego, CA, USA. cwierenga@health.ucsd.edu.
Carina S BrownSan Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA.
Erin E ReillyUniversity of California San Francisco, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

Incentive Processing and Learning in Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia NervosaR01MH125880 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHRISTINA E WIERENGA · 2022 to 2026
$3.6M
Using Computational Modeling to Test Reinforcement Learning as a Predictor of Response in Family-Based Treatment for Adolescent Anorexia NervosaK23MH131871 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Erin E. Reilly · 2022 to 2026
$982k
Computational and neural signatures of interoceptive learning in anorexia nervosaF31MH133362 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BROWN, CARINA SAMANTHA · 2023 to 2025
$83k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH133362NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH131871NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe review recent literature on instrumental reinforcement learning involving decision-making in anorexia nervosa (AN) to understand mechanisms underlying symptoms of AN, such as rigid pursuit of weight loss despite negative consequences. RECENT

findingsRelatively consistent findings indicate worse reward- and punishment-based feedback learning in the ill and weight-recovered states that is not observed in remitted samples. Initial studies suggest decreased goal-directed learning in AN, although this needs replication. Similarly, research is needed to clarify mixed findings related to learning under changing rules and the role of fear versus avoidance learning in AN. Growing evidence supports altered reinforcement learning in AN. Most studies examined the impact of outcome valence, changing rules, and habitual vs goal-directed control on learning. Computational modeling approaches can provide nuanced characterization of cognitive processes related to reinforcement learning and contribute to precision medicine efforts that may improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaDecision MakingReinforcement, PsychologyHumansRewardAnorexia nervosaDecision-makingEating disordersPunishmentReinforcement learningReward

Identifiers

PMID41055866
PMCPMC12592293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.