ArticleCardiovascular drugs and therapy2026
Relationship Between the Incidence of Metabolic Syndrome and Breast Cancer.
Article in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Can It Be that Metabolic Syndrome Protect against Breast Cancer.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBreast cancer affects females from puberty onward, with incidence rates increasing with age. Although metabolic syndrome (MetS) has reportedly increased the incidence of almost all cancers, no clear consensus on the role of MetS in breast cancer development exists. We aimed to clarify the effects of MetS on breast cancer incidence.
methodsTo investigate this relationship, we analyzed Japanese healthcare data of females from 2005 to 2020 and examined the incidence of breast cancer. MetS was evaluated based on the Japanese criteria or the NCEP ATP III guidelines at enrollment. Of 1,144,791 participants without missing data in our general public cohort, 32,775 with breast cancer at the beginning of the observation period were excluded; 54,330 participants with breast cancer were identified during the observation period.
resultsBoth pre-stage MetS and MetS, defined using the Japanese criteria, were associated with the less frequent incidence of breast cancer (hazard ratios [HRs], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.94; p < 0.005: HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.80-0.87; p < 0.005). Furthermore, MetS using NCEP ATP III was associated with the lower HR (0.87: CI, 0.84-0.90; p < 0.005), and the number of the factors from 1 to 5 was gradually associated with the lower HRs. Analysis according to age group revealed that this observation was the most prominent in the < 50-year-old group.
conclusionMetS is associated with the less frequent breast cancer incidence in females, especially aged < 50 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.