ReviewNeuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater2026
Risks of digitalization in mental health care.
Review in Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The digitalization of mental health care has ushered in transformative possibilities for enhancing access, diagnosis, and treatment through technologically enabled tools and platforms. However, this evolution presents substantial risks that warrant careful consideration. This paper critically examines the psychological, ethical, cultural, and clinical challenges embedded in digital mental health practices. Key concerns include diminished clinical oversight, compromised patient data security, algorithmic bias in diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, and the erosion of traditional therapeutic relationships. Cultural disparities in digital literacy and engagement further complicate equitable care delivery. Through a multidisciplinary lens, the paper explores how these risks may impact both care outcomes and professional standards. To bridge the gap between innovation and responsible practice, a table of best practices is provided to support clinicians and developers in ethically integrating digital tools into psychiatric settings. These recommendations aim to uphold patient autonomy, strengthen clinician accountability, and preserve the humanistic foundation of mental health care. Ultimately, the paper advocates for a balanced and cautious approach to digitalization-one that embraces opportunity without compromising clinical integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.