Observational studyJournal of medical systems2025
Development of Normative Ranges for Vital Signs and Differentiation by American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Category: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Observational study in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Normative ranges for vital signs under general anesthesia are well established for healthy pediatric patients, but the influence of The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification on these normative ranges remains unexplored. The purpose of this study is to develop age-based normative ranges for heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) in patients undergoing general anesthesia for noncardiac surgery in our institution and assess differences by ASA-PS classification. This is a retrospective observational single-center study. We reviewed all anesthetic records from the Hospital for Sick Children, Canada between March 1st and December 31st, 2023. We extracted physiological data from our in-house high-resolution physiological data repository (AtriumDB) to develop normative ranges for physiological parameters and compared them according to ASA-PS classification. We developed age-based normative ranges for BP and HR. We found significant differences between ASA-PS groups, most notably between ASA-PS 1 and 5. We found a statistically significant difference between ASA-PS 1-2 and 3-5 across all physiological parameters. This study validates existing pediatric anesthesia reference ranges while demonstrating the feasibility of incorporating patients across the spectrum of ASA-PS. Further multicenter studies are needed to generalize these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41055817What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.