ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2025
Clinical characteristics and quality of life for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in a tertiary centre in Ghana: a case control study.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the Quality of Life (QoL) and understand the clinical characteristics of patients in Ghana presenting with RRD compared to age-matched controls.
methodsThis prospective case-control study included patients presenting with RRD at a tertiary hospital in Ghana between July 2021 and June 2022 compared to age-matched unaffected individuals. QoL was evaluated using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25). Demographic and clinical characteristics were analysed.
resultsAmong 180 participants (57 RRD cases, 123 controls), QoL scores ranged 50–70 for RRD patients and 60–90 for controls. The overall composite score of NEI-VFQ-25 in the RRD patients (mean 61; SD 12) was significantly lower than that of controls (mean 78; SD 15), including 8 of 12 QoL subscales (p < 0.001). The lowest subscale scores for RRD cases were vision-specific role difficulties (mean 48; SD 8). Floaters were the most common presenting symptom among RRD cases (75.4% vs. 1.6%) (p < 0.001). RDD patients presented to a primary eye centre after an average 30.8 days (SD = 70.0) and to a tertiary centre after 200.4 days (SD = 306.8).
conclusionThere is a significant reduction in the QoL for RRD patients. Early diagnosis and management of RRD are essential to mitigate the adverse impact on QoL and prevent further complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.