ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Robotic high-intensity theater as a means to improve efficiency by increasing operative throughput: a retrospective analysis of a high-volume robotic center in the UK.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reducing surgical waiting lists remains a key national priority for healthcare systems such as the NHS in the UK. High-intensity theater (HIT) lists, designed to increase surgical throughput by optimizing theater time and perioperative care, have been proposed as a solution. However, comparative data evaluating their safety and efficiency remain limited. To evaluate the productivity and safety of robotic HIT operating lists for benign gynecological surgery, as compared to standard weekday NHS operating lists. This was a retrospective cohort study using a prospectively maintained hospital registry. Robotic gynecological procedures performed on five HIT lists between Nov 2023 and July 2024 were compared with standard elective NHS lists during the same period. Patient demographics, operative times, complication rates, and length of stay were analyzed. A total of 194 cases were included (164 standard, 30 HIT). Case complexity was lower in the HIT cohort (p = 0.049). Mean operative time was significantly reduced in the HIT group (72.5 vs. 129.3 min, p < 0.001), with no increase in postoperative complications (13% vs. 29%, p > 0.05). HIT patients had significantly shorter hospital stays (0.4 vs. 1.2 days, p < 0.001), and comparable rates of readmission and training case involvement. HIT robotic gynecological operating lists enable efficient, safe surgical care with shorter operative times and earlier discharge, without compromising training or patient safety. Wider adoption of this model may help to reduce NHS surgical backlogs and optimize theater utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41055804What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.