ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Experimental Biomechanical study on the consequences of dashboard injury of the pelvis after total hip replacement.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fractures of the pelvic ring and acetabulum are caused by high-energy trauma, usually by traffic accidents. Acetabular fractures occur when a force drives the head of the femur against the acetabulum. As the prevalence of patients living with a total hip prosthesis (THR) increases, the chance of suffering periprosthetic acetabulum fractures also elevates. However, the injury threshold of forces resulting in a periprosthetic acetabular fracture is unknown. The study aimed to analyze the results of a dashboard injury on the acetabulum after total hip replacement through a head-on collision in an ex-vivo experiment. A cemented cup was implanted into hemipelves removed from cadavers, and a dashboard injury was simulated with an impact of a pendulum-like structure released from different heights. The impact energy increased until inflicting acetabular fracture. Eleven hemipelves were examined, of which five were male and six were female. The average force required to cause damage to the pelvis was 5852 N (3950-8386). Isolated acetabular component loosening was noticed with cement fracture in one case (at 5344 N force), acetabular cup loosening occurred combined with posterior column fracture in three cases (at 8386, 3950, 6295 N force), and acetabular cup loosening combined with acetabular floor fracture occurred in six cases (at 4305, 4573, 6531, 4707, 8174, 6117 N force). A combination of all three mechanisms occurred in one case: acetabular cup loosening, with posterior column and acetabular floor fracture at 5986 N force. The results of the ex-vivo experiment indicate that in a dashboard injury, at least around 4000 N force and 4 J impact energy is necessary to create a periacetabular fracture. The results suggest that a larger force is necessary for damage to occur in male pelvises: fractures occurred mostly below 5000 N force in female pelvises, while they occurred above 6000 N in most males.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.