ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2025
Multi-label diagnosis of dental conditions from panoramic x-rays using attention-enhanced deep learning.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning-assisted mRNA vaccine pharmacovigilance: a systematic review of multi-source real-world data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Application of an improved YOLOv5s-based deep learning model for automated detection of pulmonary adenocarcinomaFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Identification and Validation of PYCR1 and PYGM as Prognostic Biomarkers for Osteosarcoma.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and evaluate automated deep learning models for multi-class classification of dental conditions in panoramic X-ray images, comparing the effectiveness of custom CNN architectures with attention mechanisms, pre-trained models, and hybrid approaches. METHODOLOGY: A dataset of 1,512 panoramic dental X-rays was preprocessed through segmentation, creating 4,764 class-balanced images across four categories: Fillings, Cavity, Implant, and Impacted Tooth. Data augmentation and preprocessing techniques including brightness adjustment, CLAHE enhancement, and normalization were applied. Multiple architectures were evaluated: custom CNN with attention mechanism, pre-trained models (VGG16, ResNet50, Xception) with attention integration, and hybrid CNN-machine learning approaches (CNN + SVM, CNN + Random Forest, CNN + Decision Tree). Performance was assessed using 5-fold cross-validation with accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC metrics.
resultsThe hybrid CNN + Random Forest model with preprocessing achieved the highest performance: 90.6% accuracy, 0.987 ROC-AUC, and 0.906 F1-score. Preprocessing consistently improved performance across all architectures, with accuracy gains ranging from 6.3% (VGG16) to 19.4% (ResNet50). The custom CNN with attention mechanism reached 86.0% accuracy, outperforming conventional CNN approaches (76.0%). Among pre-trained models, Xception with preprocessing achieved 79.8% accuracy.
conclusionHybrid CNN-machine learning approaches demonstrated superior performance for dental condition classification compared to end-to-end deep learning models. However, clinical implementation requires addressing the dataset limitation of lacking normal/healthy cases and conducting prospective validation studies across diverse clinical populations to establish real-world effectiveness and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41055759What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.