ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2025
Machine learning-based hepatocellular carcinoma risk prediction model for patients with HBV-related compensated advanced chronic liver disease.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Virus infections and cancers: from mechanisms to therapeutics.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Developing a fully automated imaging biomarker for HCC risk assessment via MRI-based tumor segmentation and EPM.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma risk and survival in patients with diabetic cirrhosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePatients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) demonstrate significant liver fibrosis and portal hypertension, further increasing their hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning-based HCC risk prediction models.
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 1051 patients with HBV-related cACLD, randomly allocated patients to training (n = 736) and validation (n = 315) cohorts. Feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). Based on the selected key features, five machine learning models were constructed: SVM, RF, logistic regression, extreme gradient boosting, and Naive Bayes. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, etc. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method was employed for model interpretability analysis.
resultsDuring a median follow-up time of 35 (20–55) months, 103 patients (9.8%) developed HCC. Feature selection analysis identified five key predictors: liver stiffness measurement (LSM), age, platelet, bile acid, and white blood cell count. The RF model demonstrated superior performance with an AUC of 0.979, an accuracy of 0.977, and a sensitivity of 0.808. SHAP interpretability analysis identified LSM as the most influential predictor (mean SHAP value 1.2), followed by age and other indicators. Feature interaction analysis revealed significant synergistic effects between LSM, platelet, and bile acid.
conclusionMachine learning-based HCC risk prediction models, particularly the RF algorithm, demonstrated excellent predictive performance in patients with HBV-related cACLD. LSM emerged as the most critical predictive factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.