ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Continous or fixedcarfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (krd) for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, retrospective real-life surveyfrom European myeloma network (emn) Italy.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on the results of the ASPIRE trial, the KRd regimen (carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone) has been approved in Italy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients since 2016. The published KRd schedule indicates this combination for 18 cycles, followed by continuous Rd until progression. However, in Italy, there are no limits to the number of KRd cycles, fully refunded based on negotiation with the Italian regulatory agency, and in some centers this combination has been used continuously, beyond the 18th cycle (continuous KRd, cKRd). To evaluate and compare safety and efficacy of both continuous and fixed KRd, we retrospectively collected real-world data from 356 patients treated in 20 EMN (European Myeloma Network) Italian centers from October 2016 to September 2023 and we patients treated with cKRd with those treated with the ASPIRE schedule. After a median follow-up of 48.59 months (CI 27.24-61.24), the overall response rate (ORR) of the entire series was 83% with 35% of complete responses(CR). The mPFS was 23.1 months (CI 20.11-28.62) and mOS was 62.85 months (CI 53.75-70.34), longer than the mOS of the ASPIRE study (48.3 months). The landmark analysis of the cKRd population shows non-significant benefit both in terms of PFS and OS compared to patients where the administration of KRd was stopped at the 18th cycle as in the ASPIRE trial, to note, in the cKRd group patients had a more aggressive disease based on ISS and R-ISS stage. Therefore, although we did not observe additional toxicities, our retrospective analysis, while confirming the validity of the KRd regimen in RRMM, does not indicate any general advantage in keeping the administration of carfilzomib beyond the ASPIRE schedule.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.