ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Radiomics-based prediction of intraoperative blood loss during intracranial meningiomas surgery.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meningiomas surgery is frequently accompanied by substantial blood loss, which is associated with an increased incidence of medical morbidities. Neuroimaging features, such as radiomic characteristics, could provide additional quantitative information on the tumor. Nonetheless, the usefulness of radiomics in predicting intraoperative blood loss has yet to be validated. Our objective was to examine the potential of radiomics to predict intraoperative blood loss in patients with intracranial meningiomas. A total of 137 patients with primary diagnosed intracranial meningiomas were evaluated via high-resolution brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which included T1-weighted pre- and postcontrast imaging, T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted (with apparent diffusion coefficient) imaging, and arterial spin labeling (ASL). MRI data were processed with subsequent extraction of radiomic features. The most significant predictors were determined via random forest regression analysis to model the relationships between selected metrics and the rate of intraoperative bleeding. We created a regression model based on ten radiomic predictors, including first- and second-order radiomic features. The resulting model allowed us to predict intraoperative blood loss in patients with intracranial meningiomas with a mean absolute error of 135.14 ml and R-squared value of 0.29, which could be considered good prediction quality. Tumor volume, tumor location, histological grade, and surgery duration were found to be less significant predictors than the other parameters and did not improve the model. Radiomic features could be useful in predicting intraoperative blood loss and provide valuable information for the presurgical evaluation of patients with intracranial meningiomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41055710What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.