ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025
AI assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes on routine H&E-slides as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer-a real-world study.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond pCR Prediction: Subtype-Specific Artificial Intelligence for Treatment Tailoring in Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Therapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- AI-assisted image analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as a prognostic marker in chemotherapy-naïve luminal breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Review
- Level of estrogen receptor expression, histological grade, and computationally assessed stromal TILs on pre-treatment biopsies predict pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Applications in Diagnosis, Treatment Response, and Prognosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in Breast Cancer Research: Immunological, Pathological, and Pharmacological Perspectives for Improving Patient Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- From compliance to clinical value: an EU AI Act-aligned playbook for digital pathology laboratories.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are a predictive and prognostic biomarker in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2 + breast cancer (BC). This study applies artificial intelligence (AI) to evaluate their value in a multi-institutional cohort of TNBC and HER2 + BC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). A supervised deep learning pipeline was developed to analyze hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images from a discovery cohort of 273 patients and a validation cohort of 245 BC patients. AI quantified stromal TILs percentage, stromal TILs density, and intraepithelial TILs density. Associations between AI-derived TILs metrics, clinicopathological characteristics, and patient outcomes were assessed. AI-based scores were highly correlated with pathologists' scores (Spearman R = 0.61-0.77, p-val < .001). Higher AI-assessed TILs levels were significantly associated with better NACT response, and both stromal and intraepithelial TILs were strong and independent predictors of pathological complete response in TNBC and HER2 + subtypes. Furthermore, patients with higher TILs had longer disease-free survival and overall survival in the discovery cohort and TNBC subtype, but not in HER2 + BC. This study supports AI-driven TILs quantification as a predictive and prognostic tool in BC patients receiving NACT. AI-derived stromal and intraepithelial TILs densities are independent predictors of response, highlighting their potential for integration into digital pathology workflows for risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41055693What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.