Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41055684›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025

Shared Decision-Making. A Primer for Clinicians.

Glyn Elwyn, Pål Gulbrandsen, Hannah Leavitt, Eman Abukmail, Marla L Clayman, Adrian Edwards, Jeanette Finderup, Alana Fisher, Stuart W Grande, Pola Hahlweg and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Shared Decision-Making with Palliative Care Specialist.Journal of hospice and palliative care · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Glyn ElwynThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, WTRB, Lebanon, NH, USA. glynelwyn@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0917-6286
Pål GulbrandsenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, HØKH Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, and Senior Researcher, Nordbyhagen, Norway.
Hannah LeavittThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, WTRB, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Eman AbukmailInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Marla L ClaymanCenter for Health Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
Adrian EdwardsDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Cardiff, UK.
Jeanette FinderupDepartment of Medicine and Nephrology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Alana FishereCentreClinic, School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Stuart W GrandeDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Pola HahlwegDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Tammy HoffmannInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Wen-Hsuan HouDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
María José Hernández-LealDepartment of Community, Maternity and Pediatric Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Debra LeungDepartment of Anaesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Medicine. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Weiwei LuDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, HKSAR, China.
Lars MandelkowCentre for Shared Decision Making, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Kristen E PecanacSchool of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Arwen H PieterseMedical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Amy PriceDartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Jannicke RabbenFaculty of Health and Sport Science, Department of Health and Nursing Science, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Paula RigantiFamily and Community Medicine Department Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Perón, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Michael SanataniDivision of Medical Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Fülöp ScheiblerNational Competency Center for Shared Decision Making, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Elise SchoefsDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Owen A TaylorCardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Victor Phillip Dahdaleh Heart and Lung Research Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Kathrene D ValentineDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Richard WexlerInformed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceShared decision-making is a widely promoted approach, yet clinicians, typically supportive in principle, find it difficult to implement because of concerns and barriers they commonly encounter in practice.

objectiveTo generate a primer that describes shared decision-making from the perspective of clinicians.

methodsWe collaborated with clinicians, patient representatives, and health service researchers. We invited members of the International Society of Shared Decision Making to co-produce a primer for clinicians using a series of jointly edited online documents. We shared drafts with other clinicians and patients. Finally, we integrated the contributions until we had arrived at a consensus.

findingsTwenty-five people from 13 countries contributed; 9 had medical qualifications, 4 had nursing qualifications, and 12 others had a range of backgrounds. A total of 30 patients and clinicians provided further comments. The description differs from previous versions because it addresses the barriers that clinicians frequently mention. It describes how to overcome common challenges by emphasizing the importance of a clear invitation at initiation; it suggests how to manage patients' resistance to shouldering decisional responsibility; reinforces the need to allow time for deliberation, especially with other stakeholders; and reassures clinicians that consensus, albeit welcome, need not be the goal of shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This primer portrays a reflective clinician who is aware of power asymmetry, patient vulnerability, risk communication, health literacy, agenda setting, and goal clarification. It envisages a clinician who is curious about personal perspectives and who can offer collaborative, iterative, and deliberative steps.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsHumansco-productionpatient-centered careshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID41055684
PMCPMC12686322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.