ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Shared Decision-Making. A Primer for Clinicians.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The "good cancer" paradox: Decisional conflict and unmet support needs in patients with thyroid cancer facing surgical decisions-A mixed-methods study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of an everyday patient-centered discussion model for primary care: An exploratory, single-center study in the VA primary care setting.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- SHARED DECISION MAKING: A FUNDAMENTAL COMPONENT OF PATIENT-CENTERED CARE FOR DENTAL PATIENTS.The journal of evidence-based dental practice · 2026Article
- The development and pilot testing of a shared decision-making encounter aid for weight management decisions.Obesity pillars · 2026Article
- Shared Decision-Making in Dialysis Modality Selection Among Adults with Advanced Kidney Disease in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Medical information and decision-making in palliative cancer: a qualitative study of patients' perceptions, needs, and preferences regarding physician communication.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- PeriOperative Quality Initiative consensus statement recommendations on the definitions, aims and delivery of shared decision-making for major surgery.Anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Perspectives on shared decision making related to medications from patients with multiple long-term conditions transitioning from hospital to home: a qualitative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- AI-Simulated Patients for Training Shared Decision-Making: Feasibility Study in Medical Education.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on decision-making about lung cancer screening participation: a cross-sectional study in Flanders.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Personalizing prevention for healthy cardiovascular aging: Geriatric cardiology in the 2024-2025 hypertension and dyslipidemia guidelines.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Australian General Practitioners' perspectives, experiences and use of non-drug interventions in primary care: a qualitative study.Family medicine and community health · 2026Article
- (Mis)trust among patients seeking unproven stem cell therapies: a qualitative analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Implementing Patient Decision Aids for Insulin Initiation in China: What are the Barriers and Facilitators? A TDF-Based Qualitative Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
- 'A return on investment'. How shared decision-making benefits doctors: a key informant interview study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Shared Decision-Making with Palliative Care Specialist.Journal of hospice and palliative care · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceShared decision-making is a widely promoted approach, yet clinicians, typically supportive in principle, find it difficult to implement because of concerns and barriers they commonly encounter in practice.
objectiveTo generate a primer that describes shared decision-making from the perspective of clinicians.
methodsWe collaborated with clinicians, patient representatives, and health service researchers. We invited members of the International Society of Shared Decision Making to co-produce a primer for clinicians using a series of jointly edited online documents. We shared drafts with other clinicians and patients. Finally, we integrated the contributions until we had arrived at a consensus.
findingsTwenty-five people from 13 countries contributed; 9 had medical qualifications, 4 had nursing qualifications, and 12 others had a range of backgrounds. A total of 30 patients and clinicians provided further comments. The description differs from previous versions because it addresses the barriers that clinicians frequently mention. It describes how to overcome common challenges by emphasizing the importance of a clear invitation at initiation; it suggests how to manage patients' resistance to shouldering decisional responsibility; reinforces the need to allow time for deliberation, especially with other stakeholders; and reassures clinicians that consensus, albeit welcome, need not be the goal of shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This primer portrays a reflective clinician who is aware of power asymmetry, patient vulnerability, risk communication, health literacy, agenda setting, and goal clarification. It envisages a clinician who is curious about personal perspectives and who can offer collaborative, iterative, and deliberative steps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.