ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025
Clinical validation of the terminology subset for newborns with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter in Intensive Care.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo clinically validate a terminological subset of the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®) for newborns (NB) with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC), in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).
methodClinical validation study of an ICNP terminology subset®. The research was conducted through the following steps: application of the Nursing Process in NB admitted to a NICU, development of case studies, and assessment of agreement among experts. For data analysis, the Kappa coefficient of agreement, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used.
resultsThe evaluation of diagnoses/outcomes and interventions indicated an agreement ranging from almost perfect to perfect, with ICC classified as excellent. The application of the Kruskal-Wallis test revealed the absence of statistically significant differences between the evaluations.
conclusionThe study clinically validated a subset of 53 nursing diagnoses/outcomes and 110 interventions, demonstrating their applicability in the care of neonates with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.