Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41055508›Full record

ArticleCancer2025

Lobular breast cancer statistics, 2025.

Angela N Giaquinto, Rachel A Freedman, Lisa A Newman, Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca L Siegel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Toward targeted therapeutics for lobular breast cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angela N GiaquintoSurveillance, Prevention, and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2548-9693
Rachel A FreedmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lisa A NewmanDepartment of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2059-0477
Ahmedin JemalSurveillance, Prevention, and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0000-4111
Rebecca L SiegelSurveillance, Prevention, and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer statistics and clinical trial data largely reflect ductal carcinoma, the dominant histologic subtype, concealing important differences for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the second most common subtype.

methodsNationally representative cancer registry data from the National Cancer Institute and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were used to report on the incidence and outcomes of ILC by age, race, and ethnicity among women in the United States.

resultsIn 2021 incidence of ILC was 14 per 100,000 women, which accounted for 10.6% of breast cancer diagnoses. Rates increased from 2012 through 2021 in all racial ethnic groups, ranging from 2.5% annually in American Indian/Alaska Native women to 4.4% annually in Asian American/Pacific Islander women. White women have the highest incidence overall (14.7 per 100,000), and in every age group, followed by Black women (11 per 100,000), although American Indian/Alaska Native women have the second-highest rates among those <50. Compared to ductal carcinoma, survival for ILC is slightly higher in the first 7 years after diagnosis and similar at 10 years overall, but lower for ILC for regional- and distant-stage disease, perhaps in part due to its unique metastatic pattern.

conclusionILC has distinctive characteristics that can contribute to delayed detection, resistance to therapy, and poorer prognosis for advanced disease. Differentiating ILC from ductal carcinoma in research and clinical trials could help identify risk factors, facilitate treatment efficacy, and lead to better understanding of metastatic mechanisms, thus improving outcomes for the increasing number of affected women.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, LobularAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedRegistriesSEER ProgramUnited StatesYoung Adultbreastinvasive lobular carcinomalobularsurvivaltrend

Identifiers

PMID41055508
PMCPMC12503006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.