ArticleCancer2025
Lobular breast cancer statistics, 2025.
Article in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward targeted therapeutics for lobular breast cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Multidisciplinary Management Considerations in Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer: It Isn't Just Ductal.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical Impact and Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Breast cancer ovarian metastases show increased activity of GPCR pathways.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A Nomogram Integrating Clinical and Ultrasonographic Features for Preoperative Differentiation of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of breast cancer · 2026Review
- Development and validation of an online prognostic risk stratification tool to assist decisions on perioperative chemotherapy for men with luminal early breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Lobular breast cancer and prognosis: what should we tell patients?Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Case Report: Colonic metastasis from mixed breast carcinoma masquerading as abemaciclib-associated diarrhea.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Rare overlap of subtype and phenotype: HER2-positive pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma presenting with an inflammatory breast cancer phenotype: a case report and targeted treatment strategy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Lobular breast cancer statistics, 2025.Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer statistics and clinical trial data largely reflect ductal carcinoma, the dominant histologic subtype, concealing important differences for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the second most common subtype.
methodsNationally representative cancer registry data from the National Cancer Institute and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were used to report on the incidence and outcomes of ILC by age, race, and ethnicity among women in the United States.
resultsIn 2021 incidence of ILC was 14 per 100,000 women, which accounted for 10.6% of breast cancer diagnoses. Rates increased from 2012 through 2021 in all racial ethnic groups, ranging from 2.5% annually in American Indian/Alaska Native women to 4.4% annually in Asian American/Pacific Islander women. White women have the highest incidence overall (14.7 per 100,000), and in every age group, followed by Black women (11 per 100,000), although American Indian/Alaska Native women have the second-highest rates among those <50. Compared to ductal carcinoma, survival for ILC is slightly higher in the first 7 years after diagnosis and similar at 10 years overall, but lower for ILC for regional- and distant-stage disease, perhaps in part due to its unique metastatic pattern.
conclusionILC has distinctive characteristics that can contribute to delayed detection, resistance to therapy, and poorer prognosis for advanced disease. Differentiating ILC from ductal carcinoma in research and clinical trials could help identify risk factors, facilitate treatment efficacy, and lead to better understanding of metastatic mechanisms, thus improving outcomes for the increasing number of affected women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.