Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41055333›Full record

ReviewmSystems2025

Harnessing machine learning for metagenomic data analysis: trends and applications.

Shradha Sharma, Hari Priya Narahari, Karthik Raman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mSystems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shradha SharmaBhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0009-0003-7599-5460
Hari Priya NarahariDepartment of Data Science and AI, Wadhwani School of Data Science and AI, IIT Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0009-0004-6227-416X
Karthik RamanThe Centre for Integrative Biology and Systems medicinE (IBSE), Wadhwani School of Data Science and AI, IIT Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9311-7093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metagenomic sequencing has revolutionized our understanding of microbial ecosystems by enabling high-resolution profiling of microbes across diverse environments. However, the resulting data are high-dimensional, sparse, and noisy, posing challenges for downstream data analysis. Machine learning (ML) has provided an arsenal of tools to extract meaningful insights from such large and complex data sets. This review surveys the existing state of ML applications in metagenomic data analysis, from traditional supervised and unsupervised learning to time-series modeling, transfer learning, and newer directions such as causal ML and generative models. We highlight certain key challenges and delve into important issues like model interpretability, emphasizing the importance of explainable AI (XAI). We also compare ML with mechanistic models, commenting on their relative advantages, disadvantages, and prospects for synergy. Finally, we preview future directions, such as the incorporation of multi-omics data, synthetic data generation, and Agentic AI systems, highlighting the increasingly prominent role that AI and ML will play in the future of microbiome science.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMetagenomeMetagenomicsMicrobiotaDatasets as TopicHost Microbial InteractionsHumansMultiomicsSoil Microbiologydeep learningmachine learningmetagenomicsmicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID41055333
PMCPMC12625703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.