ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2025
Prevalence of uncorrected refractive error in low-resource high schools in the Free State, South Africa.
Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eyecare health promotion in schools around the Free State Province, South Africa: school-based interventional study.International journal of public health · 2026Trial
- Perceived barriers to eye care use among secondary school students with pinhole-improvable reduced visual acuity in two schools in Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Parents' and teachers' perspectives on the barriers to spectacle uptake among learners in the Free State, South Africa.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe continuous increase in the prevalence of refractive error (RE) globally, with uncorrected refractive error (URE) having been established as the leading cause of visual impairment (VI) in children, is a public health concern. Previous RE studies in South Africa also indicated a growing prevalence, substantiating the burden on schoolchildren.
aimTo determine the prevalence of URE among high school learners.
settingNo-fee-paying high schools in the Free State, South Africa.
methodsA school-based cross-sectional study design was conducted on 13- to 19-year-old learners through a multistage stratified random method. The examination included an unaided logarith of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) visual acuity test, binocular motor alignment tests, ocular health assessment and cycloplegic autorefraction.
resultsA total of 868 learners consented to participate in this study, with a mean age of 16.4 ± 1.7 years. Male participants accounted for 34.5% (n = 299), while female participants accounted for 65.6% (n = 569), with the majority being Grade 10 learners. The prevalence of URE stood at 27.1% (n = 233), with astigmatism being the most prevalent ametropia, accounting for 22.3% (192 cases), followed by myopia at 15.1% (n = 130) and hyperopia at 5.4% (n = 46).
conclusionA high prevalence of URE, especially among older participants, was established, prompting an urgent concerted intervention from all stakeholders to curb the scourge.Contribution: This study accentuates the visual situation of vulnerable learners, that is, older children from disadvantaged backgrounds in the Free State, which until this point had not been established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.