ArticleCurationis2025
Experiences of simulated patients in clinical skills laboratory: A qualitative study.
Article in Curationis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Simulation to the Clinical Area: A Mixed-Methods Study Comparing Skills Laboratory Proficiency and Clinical Performance (RLE) Among Nursing Students in a Philippine University.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNursing simulations with simulated patients (SPs) have proven effective in creating realistic opportunities to enhance the students' clinical competence within a safe learning environment. This setting helps to reduce anxiety and increases self-confidence among health sciences students. This study aimed to explore experiences of SPs in clinical skills laboratory of a Department of Nursing at a university in Western Cape.
objectivesObjectives were set to explore the contextual elements of SPs' experiences during clinical skills sessions, identify educational design aspects from those experiences and assess their views on student outcomes.
methodA qualitative descriptive, exploratory and contextual design was used. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with eight SPs. The data were coded to develop emerging themes and sub-themes, following Braun and Clark's systematic analysis process. An independent coder reviewed findings, and themes were confirmed during a consensus meeting.
resultsThis study found that SPs engaged in multiple role-play consultations, improving their understanding of healthcare consultation structures and rules. They recognised their roles in achieving the outcomes needed for students.
conclusionThis study confirmed existing literature on SPs in a clinical skills laboratory within a Department of Nursing. Participant interviews provided verbatim quotations that enriched findings.Contribution: The study aimed to recommend ways for a Department of Nursing to support SPs in improving their laboratory skills and enhancing student learning. Expanding this research to other nursing education institutions could provide a broader understanding of SPs' experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.