Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41055134›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2026

Removal of Transgenes and Evaluation of Yield Penalties in Genome Edited Bacterial Blight Resistant Rice Varieties.

Eliza P I Loo, José C Huguet-Tapia, Michael Selvaraj, Melissa Stiebner, Britta Killing, Marcel Buchholzer, Van Schepler-Luu, Thomas Hartwig, Sandra P Valdéz Gutierrez, Madlen I Rast-Somssich and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A critical role ofPNAS nexus · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Eliza P I LooFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Molecular Physiology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7622-1139
José C Huguet-TapiaDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Florida Gainesville, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7667-1167
Michael SelvarajThe Alliance of Bioversity International and International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2394-0399
Melissa StiebnerFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Molecular Physiology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8626-0951
Britta KillingFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Molecular Physiology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Marcel BuchholzerFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Molecular Physiology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7485-6918
Van Schepler-LuuFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Molecular Physiology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0709-2783
Thomas HartwigFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Molecular Physiology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2707-2771
Sandra P Valdéz GutierrezThe Alliance of Bioversity International and International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Madlen I Rast-SomssichFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Molecular Physiology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christian Paolo BalahadiaInternational Rice Research Institute, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Inez H Slamet-LoedinInternational Rice Research Institute, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Ricardo OlivaThe Alliance of Bioversity International and International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Boris SzurekPlant Health Institute of Montpellier (PHIM), IRD, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1808-7082
Joe TohmeThe Alliance of Bioversity International and International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Paul ChavarriagaThe Alliance of Bioversity International and International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Frank F WhiteDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Florida Gainesville, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9905-2454
Bing YangDivision of Plant Sciences, Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2293-3384
Wolf B FrommerFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Molecular Physiology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6465-0115

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt FoundationBill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV-063189Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC-2048/1-project ID 390686111 (CEPLAS)Gates Foundation INV-008733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial blight (BB) of rice, caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo), is one of the major drivers of yield losses in Africa and Asia. Xoo secretes TAL-effectors (TALe) that induce host SWEET sucrose uniporter by binding to the effector binding element (EBE) of SWEET promoters, likely required for Xoo reproduction and virulence. We had multiplex edited the EBEs of three SWEET genes to prevent TALe binding, producing genome-edited (GE'd) rice mega-varieties (IR64, Ciherang-Sub1 for Asia and Komboka for Africa) that were resistant to a wide spectrum of Xoo strains. Here, we report comprehensive analyses of the GE'd lines, including evaluation of agronomic performance in multi-location multi-season experimental field plots under different fertilisation regimes and tests for the presence/absence of foreign DNA/transgene in the offspring of GE'd lines (IR64-BC1T6, Ciherang-Sub1-BC1T5, Komboka-T3). Various strategies were evaluated, including herbicide tolerance, PCR, DNA gel blotting, whole genome sequencing (WGS), and specific tests stipulated by country-specific biosafety guidelines. Different WGS technologies were evaluated and also used to identify the heritability of the edits, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and insertions/deletions (indels) that might have resulted from somaclonal variation and potential GE-induced off-target mutations. Complete genome reference sequences for the parental lines IR64, Ciherang-Sub1, and Komboka are provided. In the field experiments, the GE'd lines did not show performance defects. Together, the results indicate that select GE'd lines do not contain foreign DNA or transgene fragments and fulfil the requirements for treatment equivalent to classical breeding lines in countries such as India and Kenya.

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceGene EditingOryzaPlant DiseasesTransgenesXanthomonasGenome, PlantPlants, Genetically ModifiedAfricafield trialIndiaregulationsTAL effectorwhole genome sequencingXanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzaeyield

Identifiers

PMID41055134
PMCPMC12906797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.