Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41055130›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025

Grizzly bear population genomics across a coastal-interior ecotone in British Columbia, Canada.

Lauren H Henson, Kris A Christensen, Ben J G Sutherland, Hollie A Johnson, Bridgett vonHoldt, Astrid Vik Stronen, Paul C Paquet, Jason Moody, Ben F Koop, Chris T Darimont

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lauren H HensonDepartment of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
Kris A ChristensenDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0021-0326
Ben J G SutherlandSutherland Bioinformatics, Lantzville, BC V0R 2H0, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2029-9893
Hollie A JohnsonDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Bridgett vonHoldtDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6908-1687
Astrid Vik StronenBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva ulica 101, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Paul C PaquetDepartment of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
Jason MoodyNuxalk Stewardship Office, Bella Coola, BC V0T 1C0, Canada.
Ben F KoopDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0045-5200
Chris T DarimontDepartment of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.

Funding

Genome BC GeneSolve GEN013LHHMITACS Accelerate IT07676Raincoast Chair of Applied Conservation Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local adaptation research often focuses on discrete populations without extensive gene flow that are under differential selective pressures. By contrast, grizzly bears Ursus arctos in British Columbia (BC) are wide-ranging omnivores that span an environmental and resource ecotone from the coastal, salmon-enriched rainforest to dry interior plateau. This ecotone has been associated with local adaptation in other species and the different regions to morphological variation in grizzly bears. To understand genome-wide population genetic patterns across the ecotone and to identify loci or genomic regions associated with these different environments, here we use whole-genome resequencing to characterize 3.9 M SNPs in 31 grizzly bears spanning from central to northern latitudes in coastal and interior regions (to the west and east of the coastal mountain range [CMR], respectively). Clustering grizzly samples by genotypes identified 3 groups that generally correspond to the source geographic regions, with the greatest variation occurring from north to south. The data were best explained by a single ancestry cluster, but K = 3 recovered the 3 geographic groupings and were used to identify putative nonmigrant individuals. The presence of individuals with mixed ancestry (using K = 3) provides evidence for travel across the CMR, but significant differentiation between clusters (mean FST = 0.015 to 0.036) suggests some genetic separation between the regions, supporting an isolation-by-distance or clinal variation model. Putative close-kin were identified and removed, then multiple supervised outlier SNP detection methods were applied to identify regions of the genome consistently segregating between coastal and interior regions. Several associated genomic regions and candidate genes were identified, including a consistently identified outlier region near the gene creatine kinase, m-type. This work provides the first genome-wide analysis of grizzly bears in the studied region. These findings will be useful for connectivity planning and research on the adaptability of coastal and interior grizzlies to future climate change scenarios.

Indexed as

EcosystemGenetics, PopulationGenomicsMetagenomicsUrsidaeAnimalsBritish ColumbiaGenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotideconservation genomicsgrizzly bearlocal adaptationpopulation genomicssingle nucleotide polymorphismwhole genome resequencing

Identifiers

PMID41055130
PMCPMC12693532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.