ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2025
Preparing for Potential Health and Safety Risks at the Olympic Games: Scoping Review.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Olympic Games are an example of a mass gathering that involves a complex and large crowd composition, with a large number of illnesses and injuries occurring at previous Olympic Games, and the Olympic Games also becoming a target for terrorist attacks. Objective: With the help of mass-gathering medicine as a guide, this study aims to critically summarize and analyze the state of illness, injury, and terrorism during the Olympic Games in order to reduce the incidence of illnesses and injuries in crowds and to offer lessons for the organization of major international sporting events such as the Olympics. Methods: The procedure for this scoping review followed the 5-step methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley. We searched electronic databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. We extracted, summarized, and categorized general information on each study, game characteristics, illness and injury profiles, terrorism characteristics, preventive measures, and surveillance paradigms. Results: We conducted a database search and retrieved a total of 9587 studies on 2 occasions. After removing duplicates and screening, we included 120 studies. Only 12 studies on the Summer, Winter, and Paralympic Games published before 2000, and 108 studies from 2000 onward, comprise the 120 studies, marking an unprecedented number of studies in this field of research, particularly in recent times. Of the 120 studies, 80 were illness-related, 81 were injury-related, and 2 were terrorism-related. Nine studies explicitly assessed body parts, including shoulders, feet, and dentistry; 26 studies specifically investigated certain illnesses and injuries, such as COVID-19 disease, heat-related illnesses, and concussions. Of the 120 research studies, 18 specifically analyzed sports such as gymnastics and weight lifting, with 11 studies focusing especially on COVID-19 disease. The most studied games were the Tokyo 2021 Olympic or Paralympic Games, the London 2012 Olympic or Paralympic Games, and the Rio 2016 Olympic or Paralympic Games. The system of injury and illness surveillance in the Olympic Games goes through 3 stages of development: the first trial of information technology, the construction of networks, and the enhancement of intelligence. Conclusions: A critical summary of studies of illness, injury, and terrorist attacks at previous Olympic Games is important for injury and terrorism prevention at major sporting events such as the Olympic Games. Surveillance methods require improvements in surveillance technology, data sharing, and privacy protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.