Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41055047›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia2026

Barriers and facilitators to the delivery of delirium care in intensive care units: an analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Roxanne M Parslow, Ben Gibbison, Maria Pufulete, Kathryn M Rowan, Andrew J Moore, OPTIC Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roxanne M ParslowBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ben GibbisonBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3635-6212
Maria PufuleteBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Kathryn M RowanIntensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK.
Andrew J MooreBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
OPTIC Study Group

Funding

Programme Development Grant NIHR204591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDelirium is common in patients who are critically ill and associated with increased mortality and long-term cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was to explore the barriers and facilitators to the use of existing ICU delirium identification tools and implementation of care protocols.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals working in UK NHS ICUs. Purposive sampling was utilised to recruit a diverse range of participants to account for profession; user status of delirium identification tools or care packages; size of unit; and UK location. Thematic analysis was undertaken using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

resultsTwenty-one ICU healthcare professionals were interviewed from 20 hospitals. Participants included consultants (n = 9); nurses (n = 8); advanced critical care practitioners (n = 2); and allied health professionals (n = 2). Five major barriers to effective delirium care emerged: lack of prioritisation; lack of structured ICU delirium care protocols; inability to implement interventions due to physical space constraints and/or lack of resources; loss of experienced staff; and changes in ICU nursing culture. Facilitators included the presence of clear protocols; continued staff training; increased awareness; delirium champions; post-ICU follow-up clinics; family engagement; effective communication; and the use of digital prompts as a component of mandatory electronic documentation. DISCUSSION: Although ICU delirium is acknowledged as being important by clinical staff, management is often hindered by systemic and cultural barriers. Healthcare professionals highlighted the need for protocol-driven care, enhanced training and awareness, and the inclusion of families in care processes. These findings will inform the design of a multicomponent care package to improve delirium care in the ICU.

Indexed as

Critical CareDeliriumDelivery of Health CareIntensive Care UnitsAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHumansUnited Kingdomdeliriumintensive care unitqualitativetheoretical domains framework

Identifiers

PMID41055047
PMCPMC12803597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.