Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41055019›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2025

Exceptional Visual-Opsin Coexpression and Phenotypic Diversity in Outer-Retinal Photoreceptors of Caenophidian Snakes.

Einat Hauzman, Silke Haverkamp, Juliana H Tashiro, Irene L Gügel, Natalia F Torello-Viera, Thaís B Guedes, Pavel Němec, Nicholas R Casewell, Cassandra M Modahl, Maria Ermelinda Oliveira and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Einat HauzmanDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Psychology Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1561-2769
Silke HaverkampDepartment of Computational Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-7820-1119
Juliana H TashiroDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Psychology Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5272-1713
Irene L GügelDepartment of Computational Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5475-9210
Natalia F Torello-VieraDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Psychology Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6691-3951
Thaís B GuedesDepartment of Biodiversity, Bioscience Institute, São Paulo State University Julio de Mesquita Filho, UNESP, Rio Claro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3318-7193
Pavel NěmecDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0277-0239
Nicholas R CasewellCentre for Snakebite Research & Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8035-4719
Cassandra M ModahlCentre for Snakebite Research & Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2211-3930
Maria Ermelinda OliveiraInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Ana Lúcia C PrudenteMuseu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG) Belém, Pará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4164-6815
Daniel O MesquitaDepartment of Systematic and Ecology, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8174-6837
Dora Fix VenturaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Psychology Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7616-4031
David J GowerNatural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1725-8863

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 0000056/2022Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 163302/2020Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 309409/2015-2Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 314630/2020-1European Commission 101030356European Commission Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (101Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Mato GrossoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2020/16377-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/07161-8Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/00191-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/09428-2Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2024/16897-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2025/18844-8Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado da Paraíba 09/2021United Kingdom Research and Innovation UKRI1936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snakes are a valuable yet understudied taxon for investigating evolutionary adaptations in the vertebrate retina. They possess up to three visual pigments: a short-wavelength-sensitive opsin (SWS1), a medium/long-wavelength-sensitive opsin (LWS), and rhodopsin (RH1). Nocturnal snakes have duplex retinas containing both rod and cone photoreceptors, whereas diurnal caenophidian ("advanced") snakes exhibit simplex "all-cone" retinas, lacking morphologically typical rods. In this study, we analyzed photoreceptor morphology in the retinas of caenophidian snakes using high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and examined visual-opsin expression patterns with immunohistochemistry (IHC). Our analyses revealed remarkable interspecific variability in visual-cell morphology. Light microscopy showed that in all sampled diurnal caenophidians, photoreceptors expressing RH1 exhibit a gross cone-like morphology. However, SEM analysis revealed a subset of photoreceptors with distinct features-thinner inner segments and rod-like synaptic terminals-suggesting they are transmuted, cone-like rods. In retinal sections from nocturnal caenophidian snakes, coexpression of the cone opsins SWS1 and LWS in individual cones was observed, whereas rhodopsin expression remained restricted to morphologically typical rods and showed no coexpression. In contrast, diurnal caenophidians commonly coexpress rhodopsin and SWS1 in single cones, with some instances of triple coexpression (SWS1, RH1, and LWS) in single cones. We evaluated the patterns of spatial distribution of RH1- and SWS1-expressing photoreceptors, as well as SWS1 + RH1 multiopsin cones, in wholemounted retinas of ten species. Our findings revealed considerable species-specific variation in photoreceptor density, topography, and opsin coexpression patterns. IHC results suggest that in some species, rhodopsin is not only expressed in transmuted, cone-like rods but may also be co-opted by UV/violet-sensitive (SWS1-expressing) cones. These findings underscore the exceptional diversity and adaptive innovation in snake visual systems. The unique features and striking interspecific differences in their photoreceptors highlight snakes as an outstanding taxon for studying vertebrate visual-system function and evolution.

Indexed as

OpsinsRetinaRod OpsinsSnakesAnimalsPhenotypeRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRhodopsinOpsinsRhodopsinRod OpsinsMultiopsin conesopsin expressionphotoreceptor morphologyretinal topographysnake retina

Identifiers

PMID41055019
PMCPMC12501914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.