ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Deep Learning for fODF Estimation in Infant Brains: Model Comparison, Ground-Truth Impact, and Domain Shift Mitigation.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Learning for fODF Estimation in Infant Brains: Model Comparison, Ground-Truth Impact, and Domain Shift Mitigation.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accurate estimation of fiber orientation distribution functions (fODFs) in diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for understanding early brain development and its potential disruptions. Although supervised deep learning (DL) models have shown promise in fODF estimation from neonatal diffusion MRI (dMRI) data, the out-of-domain (OOD) performance of these models remains largely unexplored, especially under diverse domain shift scenarios. This study evaluated the robustness of three state-of-the-art DL architectures: multilayer perceptron (MLP), transformer, and U-Net/convolutional neural network (CNN) on fODF predictions derived from dMRI data. Using 488 subjects from the developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) and the Baby Connectome Project (BCP) datasets, we reconstructed reference fODFs from the full dMRI series using single-shell three-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution (SS3T-CSD) and multi-shell multi-tissue CSD (MSMT-CSD) to generate reference fODF reconstructions for model training, and systematically assessed the impact of age, scanner/protocol differences, and input dimensionality on model performance. Our findings reveal that U-Net consistently outperformed other models when fewer diffusion gradient directions were used, particularly with the SS3T-CSD-derived ground truth, which showed superior performance in capturing crossing fibers. However, as the number of input diffusion gradient directions increased, MLP and the transformer-based model exhibited steady gains in accuracy. Nevertheless, performance nearly plateaued from 28 to 45 input directions in all models. Age-related domain shifts showed asymmetric patterns, being less pronounced in late developmental stages (late neonates, and babies), with SS3T-CSD demonstrating greater robustness to variability compared to MSMT-CSD. To address inter-site domain shifts, we implemented two adaptation strategies: the Method of Moments (MoM) and fine-tuning. Both strategies achieved significant improvements (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.