ArticleEnvironmental toxicology2026
Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Organic Sunscreens Used Worldwide, Alone and in Mixture, on Terrestrial Plants.
Article in Environmental toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Organic Sunscreens Used Worldwide, Alone and in Mixture, on Terrestrial Plants.Environmental toxicology · 2026Article
- Cellular and Systemic Toxicity Induced by Sunscreen and Paraben Mixtures and the Implications for Root Development in Cultivated Plants.Journal of toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The environmental hazards of sunscreens are discussed worldwide. However, there are few ecotoxicological studies on these compounds alone for edaphic organisms, and none for their mixtures. Avobenzone (1 and 10 ng/L), octocrylene (10 and 100 μg/L), and oxybenzone (2 and 20 μg/L), alone and in binary combinations (between the lowest and the highest concentrations), were evaluated for phytotoxicity to the roots of rustic varieties of Daucus carota and Solanum lycopersicum, and for cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in the roots of Allium cepa bulbs. In contrast to the higher concentrations, the lower concentrations of sunscreens, despite the increase in superoxide and hydroxyl radicals in the cells, did not cause changes in the length of the rootlets, since they did not affect cell elongation. In mixture, the lower concentrations caused a synergistic interaction in the roots, while the higher did not exceed the toxicity of the filters alone. In bulbs, the filters alone and in mixtures caused inhibition of cell division and mitotic spindle alterations in the meristems, mainly due to the accumulation of H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.