Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41054902›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Patient Advocacy Group Leaders' Perceptions on Primary Care's Role in Caring for Patients With a History of Breast Cancer.

Kacie Barry, Sarah J Fadem, Jennifer R Hemler, Jenna Howard, Lisa Mikesell, Denalee M O'Malley, Shawna V Hudson, Benjamin F Crabtree

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Patient Advocacy Group Leaders' Perceptions on Primary Care's Role in Caring for Patients With a History of Breast Cancer.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kacie BarryRobert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-0311-3463
Sarah J FademDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Jennifer R HemlerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Jenna HowardDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Lisa MikesellSchool of Communication and Information, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Denalee M O'MalleyDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Shawna V HudsonDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Benjamin F CrabtreeDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

Diversity Supplement to Adapting and implementing evidence-based breast cancer follow-up in primary careR01CA257197 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HUDSON, SHAWNA V. · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257197This study was funded by the National Cancer Institute (R01CA257197).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer advocacy groups engage patients, families and caregivers in navigating the cancer landscape, with a focus on early detection/screening and providing psychosocial and financial support during and after treatment. These groups are influential among their communities, funders and policymakers.

objectiveWe wished to understand perceptions of breast cancer advocacy group leaders on primary care's role in breast cancer survivorship care, given limited primary care engagement despite endorsement by the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

methodsAs part of a larger NCI-funded study, we used purposive sampling to select leaders from a diversity of patient advocacy groups for in-depth interviews (n = 9). After obtaining consent, interviews were conducted and recorded on Zoom, professionally transcribed, and analysed using an established immersion-crystallisation process to identify themes and patterns.

resultsWe interviewed leaders (n = 9) from two local, three regional and four national advocacy groups, five of whom had personal experiences with breast cancer. These advocates emphasised that transitions away from the safety of oncology to primary care are difficult for patients. They felt patients with a history of breast cancer have unique and complex needs that are different from the standards of care found within primary care settings, and primary care clinicians are not adequately prepared to address these. In reflecting on the ideal role of primary care, they highlighted listening to patients, identifying issues and referring patients to appropriate specialists, but ultimately stressed that patients needed to advocate for themselves in the current healthcare environment.

conclusionsAdvocacy groups typically start as grass root efforts motivated by perceptions of inadequate support and care for cancer patients. As such, there is potential for advocacy groups to shape the conversation to improve collaboration between oncology and primary care by articulating and advocating for better primary care involvement in survivorship care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The project's steering committee included cancer survivors and cancer advocacy group leaders who provided feedback on the project design and made recommendations for people to interview. Steering committee retreats were later held after the completion of interviews to reflect on emerging findings and plan dissemination strategies. The study team included a cancer survivor and several members whose immediate family members had a history of cancer. They were actively engaged in the design, analysis and manuscript writing.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLeadershipPatient AdvocacyPrimary Health CareCancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedQualitative Researchbreast cancer survivorcancer advocacy groupscancer survivorshipcare transitionpatient advocacyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID41054902
PMCPMC12501495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.