Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41054864›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Post Covid-19 Condition as a Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study on Epistemological Tensions Among Experts in Sweden.

Anna Bredström, Sofia Morberg Jämterud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Post Covid-19 Condition as a Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study on Epistemological Tensions Among Experts in Sweden.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna BredströmDepartment of Culture and Society, Division of Migration, Ethnicity and Society, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5451-8540
Sofia Morberg JämterudDepartment of Thematic Studies, Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2998-3971

Funding

The project is part of an interdisciplinary project, Biomedicine, Clinical Knowledge, and the Humanities in Collaboration: A Novel Epistemology for Radically Interdisciplinary Health Research and Policy-Work on Post COVID-19 Syndrome, funded by the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet, grant number 2021-01245).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, it became clear that some individuals experienced lingering symptoms after the infection. This condition, known as post Covid-19 condition (or long Covid), is defined by WHO as persistent or new symptoms 3 months after the initial infection, lasting for at least 2 months, and not attributable to another diagnosis. Hence, the definition is very broad.

aimThis study aims to examine how post Covid-19 condition as a diagnosis is viewed and interpreted by Swedish stakeholders, showing how these understandings carry a range of epistemological tensions. The study also seeks to understand the implications of these epistemological tensions for treatment and care organisation.

methodsQualitative interviews with 36 experts and key individuals in Sweden have been conducted.

resultExperts agree that post Covid-19 condition is a complex syndrome and that persons who suffer are in need of care. However, several tensions in post Covid-19 condition as a diagnosis can be discerned. Most experts agreed on the gender and racial disparity where white women with Swedish background were a majority of post Covid-19 sufferers, while migrant patients and the elderly are largely absent. In relation to social categories, the question if children can have post Covid-19 condition is here a highly contested question. There is also disagreement on the aetiology of post Covid-19 condition, with some experts viewing it as a new, unique condition requiring specialised treatment, while others see it as similar to other post-viral conditions, treatable in primary care.

conclusionThe article concludes that experts are divided in their understanding and that this affects Swedish policy on post Covid-19 care and treatment, showing that post Covid-19 condition is not only a medical issue but also a political battleground where science, expert opinion and patient experience shape policy. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The article focuses on studying stakeholders' perspectives as these are key for informing public opinion and policy. In this article, all main organisations and authorities involved in post Covid-19 care are represented. We also see patients as crucial stakeholders and representatives of patient organisations, as well as representatives of some migrant communities, who have been interviewed. The latter were included to gain insights from groups that were largely absent in post Covid-19 care.

Indexed as

COVID-19KnowledgeAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2SwedendiagnosisepistemologyethnicityPost COVID‐19 conditionqualitative studysocial categories

Identifiers

PMID41054864
PMCPMC12501490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.