ArticleEcology2025
Nitrogen and phosphorus co-limitation of tree growth in northern hardwood forests.
Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Climate and Soil Constraints Shape Vegetation-Zone-Dependent Leaf C:N:P Stoichiometry ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nutrient limitation of forest growth has been difficult to predict, and in temperate forests, long-term tests of single-nutrient versus multiple-element limitation are few. Nutrient co-limitation is the expected outcome of the ability of plants to adjust allocation to minimize limitation by any single resource. Nutrient limitation of productivity in northern hardwood forests was predicted by the Multiple Element Limitation (MEL) model to shift over time since harvest from single limitation by N to P at ~30 years and then, in mature forests, to co-limitation by N and P. Our work tested those predictions for tree growth in a fully factorial N and P addition experiment in 13 forest stands that we grouped in young (20-30 years), mid-age (40-50 years), and mature (>100 years old) age classes in New Hampshire, USA. Over 8 years of treatment, we found evidence of additive co-limitation of tree growth by N and P. We did not find evidence that limitation varied with time since disturbance. Our results suggest that processes contributing to co-limitation in these northern hardwood forests are effective across stands that vary widely in N status and are not sensitive to disturbance by forest harvest over time periods of several decades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.