ArticleSurgical infections2026
Infection of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage Devices.
Article in Surgical infections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVentricular reservoir infections and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt infections are diagnosed when bacteria are recovered from microbiological cultures of CSF samples from these devices. We applied high throughput sequencing (HTS) to understand the course of changes in ventricular reservoir and shunt infection microbiota.
objectivesEvaluate the utility of monitoring microbiota in CSF (1) from ventricular reservoirs to detect development of an infection and (2) during treatment of CSF shunt infections to assess treatment response.
methodsStudy populations included (1) neonates with temporizing ventricular reservoirs who developed reservoir infection and (2) children undergoing treatment for conventional culture-confirmed CSF shunt infection. The V4 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene was amplified and sequenced. Comparison of taxonomic results of HTS with standard microbiological culture results (when available) was described for each CSF sample. A robust HTS signal was defined by a microbial load of ≥1e5 microbial genome equivalents/mL.
resultsIn none of the five ventricular reservoir infection cases was there a robust HTS signal for the responsible bacteria immediately prior to infection. In six of the seven CSF shunt infection cases, there was a robust HTS signal for the genus of the responsible bacteria in the sample at the time of positive CSF culture. The proportion of sequences from the genus associated with the responsible bacteria decreased during infection treatment.
conclusionsThese pilot data suggest limited utility in using HTS for surveillance for ventricular reservoir infections, as they emerge abruptly. In CSF shunt infection, HTS demonstrates a return to heterogeneous microbiota when bacterial cultures become negative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.