Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41054765›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025

AI-Driven Orthopedic Implant Identification in Indian Clinical Practice: A Dynamic Cross-Attention Swin Transformer Approach.

G Malathi, B Latha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G MalathiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sri Sai Ram Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India.
B LathaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sri Sairam Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: This paper proposes a novel Dynamic Cross-Attention enabled Cross-Swin Transformer approach for identifying orthopedic implants efficiently. Methods: Initially, low-dimensional features are captured by employing Hybrid Patch Embedding mechanism, while the Cross-Swin transformer constructs a hierarchical feature representation. Then, Linear Multi-head Self-Attention minimizes computational complexity and broadens the receptive field for identifying large-scale features. After that, the Efficient Channel Attention strategy facilitates cross-channel communication and captures inter-channel dependencies effectively, thus avoiding dimensionality reduction. Additionally, the individualized trade-off among local convolution and global attention is maintained by Adaptive mixture units. The multi-dimensional features are effectively fused by Attention Feature Fusion Unit for optimizing network efficiency. Furthermore, an improved genetic algorithm optimizes hyper-parameters, employing chaotic opposition and Tabu search algorithms to balance global and local optimization. Results: Overall, the proposed approach identifies orthopedic implants with simple calculations and attains greater accuracy of 99.03% compared to prior orthopedic implant identification systems in terms of some common assessing measures. Conclusions: The research findings show how well the proposed technique works to identify the manufacturer and the model of orthopedic implants accurately, aiding orthopedic surgeons in the pre-operative planning of revision surgery. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-025-01432-3.

Indexed as

And Linear Multi-head Self-AttentionCross-Swin TransformerEfficient channel attentionHybrid Patch Embedding mechanismOrthopedic implant

Identifiers

PMID41054765
PMCPMC12496333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.