ArticleF&S reports2025
Time to pregnancy in young women with high response to controlled ovarian stimulation undergoing fresh transfer vs. a freeze-all strategy after in vitro fertilization treatment-a nationwide register-based cohort study.
Article in F&S reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the time to pregnancy in women ≤37 years of age with high response to controlled ovarian stimulation and undergoing an initial fresh transfer vs. those women proceeding with a freeze-all strategy. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Subjects: The study included 56,614 women, aged ≤37 years and those with ≥15 oocytes retrieved after their first oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization (IVF) between January 2014 and December 2019, with data entered in the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinical Outcomes Reporting System. Exposure: Initial fresh autologous IVF and fresh embryo transfer cycles compared with a freeze-all strategy of embryos. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was time to pregnancy resulting in live birth, defined as the start of controlled ovarian stimulation through 10 days after embryo transfer. Secondary end points included clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), miscarriage rate, live birth rate (LBR) per embryo transfer, rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, singleton birthweights, and preterm birth rate. The outcomes were assessed with proportional hazard regression analysis and adjusted for body mass index, protocol type, insemination method, days of ovarian stimulation, number of embryos transferred in the initial cycle, and reporting year of retrieval cycle. Further, a subgroup analysis was performed based on the number of oocytes retrieved (cohort A: 15-19, cohort B: 20-24, cohort C: 25-29, cohort D: 30-34, cohort E: 35-39, and cohort F: ≥40). Results: A total of 56,614 patients were included in the analysis. A total of 35,058 women (mean [SD] age, 31 [3.28] and mean [SD] body mass index, 26.4 [6.23]) underwent fresh embryo transfers and 21,556 women (mean [SD] age, 31 [3.32] and mean [SD] body mass index, 26.3 [6.19]) underwent a freeze-all strategy. The time to pregnancy in weeks, mean (SD) in women who had a fresh embryo transfer was 12.6 (20.6) and 20.8 (21.9) in women who used the freeze-all strategy. After adjusting for multiple treatment variables there was a statistically significant shorter time to pregnancy in those who had a fresh embryo transfer than those who used a freeze-all strategy (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.66 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.62-1.69], adjusted mean difference, -8.1 [95% CI, -8.64 to -7.55] weeks). In the adjusted subgroup analyses, the significant reduction in time to pregnancy between groups was compromised by a statistically significant reduction in LBR and CPR in the initial transfer cycle, but not the cumulative outcomes. The adjusted relative risk, 95% CI for LBR between groups in cohort A was 0.94 (0.92-0.97) and cohort F was 0.79 (0.72-0.87). The adjusted relative risk, 95% CI for CPR between groups in cohort A was 0.91 (0.89-0.94) and cohort F was 0.80 (0.74-0.87). Conclusion: In women ≤37 years with ≥15 oocytes retrieved after IVF, a fresh embryo transfer was associated with a statistically significant reduction in time to achieve a pregnancy, a difference of 6-8 weeks compared with a freeze-all strategy. The occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was <2% in women who underwent a fresh embryo transfer. Although a fresh embryo transfer is safe and effective, the benefit of reduction in time to pregnancy was compromised by a significant decline in LBRs with increasing number of oocytes retrieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.