ArticleCureus2025
Parastomal Hernia Repair: A Four-Year Single-Centre Experience With Elective and Emergency Outcomes.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of short-term outcomes between open and minimally invasive surgery for emergent parastomal hernia repair: A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a common complication following stoma formation, with surgical repair strategies including open, laparoscopic, and robotic techniques. Despite evolving operative approaches, recurrence and complication rates remain high, particularly in emergency settings. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of 87 patients who underwent PSH repair between 06 March 2021 and 06 March 2025 at a single UK centre. Data were extracted from the Bluespier theatre system and clinical records. Variables included patient demographics, urgency of surgery, operative approach, theatre duration, hospital stay, complications, and postoperative recurrence. Statistical comparisons were made between elective and emergency procedures, as well as between primary and recurrent repairs. Results Of the 87 patients, 42 (48.3%) were male, and the median age was 62.1 years. Most repairs were open (78.2%), with fewer laparoscopic (18.4%) and robotic (3.4%) cases. Elective surgeries accounted for 57.5%, and 23% of patients underwent repair of a previously recurrent hernia. The mean operative time was 129.5 minutes, and the mean hospital stay was 11.1 days. The overall postoperative recurrence rate was 21.8%. Recurrence rates were 22.1% for open, 25.0% for laparoscopic, and 0% for robotic repairs. Emergency cases had significantly longer hospital stays and higher complication rates compared to elective procedures (p < 0.01). Conclusion Elective PSH repair, including via minimally invasive techniques, was associated with favourable outcomes and lower recurrence. Emergency repair remains high-risk, underscoring the importance of early elective referral and optimised surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.