ArticleCureus2025
Perceptions of Japanese Medical Trainees and Physicians About Writing Case Reports: A Questionnaire-Based Survey.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWriting case reports is scientifically and educationally valuable both for junior and senior physicians. To encourage this practice, the present study aimed to assess the perceptions of Japanese medical students, residents, and physicians about the value, facilitating factors, and barriers to writing case reports and specifically to compare the perceptions of trainees with those of attending physicians.
methodsA questionnaire-based survey was administered to attendees of a lecture on case report writing held at a Japanese medical conference. The participants, who included medical students, residents, and physicians, completed a questionnaire on the benefits of, factors facilitating, and barriers to the activity of writing case reports. The respondents were categorized as trainees (postgraduate year (PGY) ≤ 6) or attending physicians (PGY ≥ 7) for comparison.
resultsIn total, 116 individuals responded. There was strong consensus on the value of writing case reports, with most of the respondents agreeing with "(case report writing) improves critical thinking" (93.9% agreed/strongly agreed). "Lectures and workshops" were most often cited (98.2%) as factors facilitating the activity. The most frequently cited barriers were "lack of formal training in writing case reports" (91.4%) and "lack of training in reviewing scientific literature" (91.4%). A subgroup analysis found that the trainees were significantly more likely than the attending physicians to cite "lack of English skills" as a barrier (81.8% vs. 59.0%; p = 0.008). More attending physicians than trainees supported the mandatory presentation of case reports at conferences (p = 0.002) and setting aside time for research or other scholarly activities (p = 0.048).
conclusionsCase reports were perceived as a highly valued academic activity among Japanese physicians in a wide range of disciplines. Identifying the respective needs of attending and early-career physicians and providing individualized support may help promote the writing of case reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.