ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2025
Building Health Commissioning Capability of Australia's Primary Health Networks -Service Providers' Perspective.
Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strengthening the Commissioning Capacity of Primary Health Networks: A Framework and Strategies for Development.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Australia's health system is strong, but fragmented across primary, secondary, and tertiary care. Primary Health Networks (PHNs) were established to streamline non-hospital-based health services and improve service effectiveness and efficiency across Australia, which can be achieved by fostering strong relationships with providers to build commissioning capabilities. Successful commissioning depends on the providers' ability to respond to commissioning opportunities. Objective: This study aimed to identify capability development opportunities that support service provider organisations commissioned by PHN to deliver effective and efficient services in primary care. Methods: A mixed-method case study approach was used, including an anonymous online survey and a focus group discussion. Results: The study confirmed the key factors for health commissioning success in the following four dimensions: workforce development, effective engagement, support and guidance, and strong relationships. The study further recommends seven key strategies for capability development, highlighting the need for PHNs to focus on building the capability of primary care organisations to establish strong markets and successfully commission services. Discussion: Building strong relationships through effective engagement that features support and guidance for service provider organisations is critical for PHNs' commissioning success. All organisations must work collaboratively and fully appreciate the unique limitations constraining PHNs that impact community needs and health outcomes. Given the variations in the size and function of commissioned service providers, factors such as locally developed service models, program differences, and regional needs should be considered when planning specific capability building activities. Conclusion: Understanding the challenges faced by provider organisations to support commissioning capability development is imperative for PHNs to successfully commission health and social care services. Identifying key actions to support capability development while building strong relationships and learning from the insights produced by this study will enhance service co-design and collectively strengthen the market's ability to meet the growing health needs of local communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.