Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41054627›Full record

ArticleJournal of equine rehabilitation2025

Cognitive and physiological impacts of psychotherapy incorporating human-equine interactions during substance withdrawal: A scoping review.

M M Friend, M C Nicodemus, C A Cavinder, C O Lemley, P Prince, K Holtcamp, R Elam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of equine rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M M FriendHuck Institutes of Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 101 Huck Life Sciences Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
M C NicodemusDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, PO Box 9815, MS 39762, USA.
C A CavinderDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, PO Box 9815, MS 39762, USA.
C O LemleyDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, PO Box 9815, MS 39762, USA.
P PrinceOffice of Psychological Services, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, PO Box 6100, MS 39762, USA.
K HoltcampOffice of Psychological Services, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, PO Box 6100, MS 39762, USA.
R ElamDepartment of Psychology, Mississippi State University, PO Box 6161, MS 39762, USA.

Funding

Research Training in Physiological Adaptations to StressT32GM154124 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI MARGHERITA T CANTORNA, Kevin John Harvatine · 2024 to 2026
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM154124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of psychotherapy incorporating equine interaction (PIE) is becoming widely utilized for the treatment of a range of conditions; however, evidence supporting the efficacy of this treatment is highly variable, inconsistently defined, and largely anecdotal. Further, few studies have investigated its use in the withdrawing substance use disorder (SUD) population. This scoping review investigates the physiological and cognitive implications of withdrawal associated with SUD in conjunction with the effects of psychotherapy utilizing equine interaction on these parameters. This review was developed following the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) scoping review protocol. The search utilized Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, and PsychInfo databases to collect literature. Of the 556 articles within the initial review, 153 papers were reviewed in full and 122 met inclusion criteria. The information from this literature indicated addiction and withdrawal chronically elevate stress responses such as cortisol. This elevation has a negative impact on cognitive functions integral to recovery. Psychotherapy incorporating equine interaction has been cited to mediate these symptoms through potential physiological coupling, thus, supporting conclusions from literature that this treatment improves recovery rates. The literature revealed enhancements in therapeutic alliances, patient comfort, confidence, mental health, emotional stability, and communication skills associated with this therapeutic intervention. As such, the literature included in this review supports the potential for the use of psychotherapy incorporating equine interaction in SUD treatment, particularly during the period of withdrawal. However, there is a lack of literature investigating physiological impacts of PIE, especially within SUD treatment.

Indexed as

AddictionHuman-equine interactionPsychotherapySubstance withdrawal

Identifiers

PMID41054627
PMCPMC12497412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.