ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Prognostic Value of SIRI in Sepsis: A Retrospective Study and Machine Learning-Based Model Development.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) Among Patients With Sepsis: A Retrospective Observational Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Association Between the Systemic Inflammatory Response Index and Severe Infection in Patients with Diabetic Foot.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- Inflammatory markers and increased risk of chronic kidney disease in patients with coronary artery disease: findings from a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, the Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI) has demonstrated unique advantages in evaluating sepsis prognosis. This study aims to investigate the predictive value of SIRI for 28-day outcomes in sepsis patients, and develop and validate a prognostic model for 28-day mortality. Methods: The demographic characteristics, disease severity, laboratory tests, treatments, and outcome measures were recorded from the adult sepsis patients. The restricted cubic splines and the ROC curve analysis were employed to evaluate the relationship and predictive capability of SIRI. Next, SIRI was categorized into tertiles, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to assess its association with prognosis, supplemented by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves, and compare mortality differences. Patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were randomly allocated into training and internal validation sets at a 3:1 ratio, using the Boruta algorithm and LASSO regression and a prognostic model was constructed via logistic regression, while patients from the First People's Hospital of Zhangjiagang City served as the external validation set. Then, the predictive performance, accuracy, and clinical utility of the model were validated using the ROC curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The 380 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and 240 patients from the First People's Hospital of Zhangjiagang City were enrolled for the present study. The restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a nonlinear increasing trend in mortality risk with rising SIRI levels. The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that SIRI has superior predictive capability than the APACHE II and SOFA scores. When SIRI was categorized into tertiles, both the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified SIRI as significantly associated to 28-day prognosis ( Conclusion: SIRI is significantly correlated to the 28-day prognosis in sepsis patients, and has excellent predictive value for short-term outcomes. The prediction model that incorporated SIRI exhibited high prognostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.