ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2025
Two Cases of Flow Diverter Placement for Early Recurrence Following Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization for Ruptured Dissecting Cerebral Aneurysms.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We report 2 cases of ruptured intracranial dissecting aneurysms that were successfully treated with a flow diverter (FD) stent in the subacute phase, following urgent stent-assisted coiling (SAC) embolization. Case Presentation: Case 1: A 48-year-old male presented with a sudden-onset headache and altered consciousness. CT showed a diffuse subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). DSA revealed a right vertebral artery dissecting fusiform aneurysm (VADA). Considering that the perforating and anterior spinal arteries arose from the VADA, SAC was performed to preserve the perforating branch. Follow-up angiography revealed regrowth of the aneurysm without hemorrhage. Case 2: A 37-year-old male was involved in a car accident, followed by a sudden loss of consciousness. CT showed diffuse SAH, and DSA revealed a right internal carotid artery (ICA) blood blister-like aneurysm (BBA) on the anterior wall of the C2 portion. We performed SAC because of the difficulty in urgent high-flow bypass and trapping due to brain swelling. Follow-up angiography revealed regrowth of the aneurysm without hemorrhage. Each treatment involved SAC using the low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) stent (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) and FD using the pipeline embolic device. The procedures were performed without complications. Conclusion: To date, few studies on stepwise treatment with SAC and FD for refractory ruptured cerebral aneurysms, such as VADA and BBA of the ICA, have been reported. In addition to the cases reported, we also reviewed previous articles on treatment results, discussed antiplatelet therapy, and provided tips for the telescoping stent procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.