ArticleJournal of public health research2025
Risks, concerns, and benefits of molecular HIV Epidemiology in Public Health Practice: A qualitative exploration of perspectives among affected and interested communities.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In the United States, HIV surveillance is a critical component of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy which includes evaluating HIV sequences for molecular HIV epidemiology (MHE). With MHE, HIV sequences that are generated from clinical drug resistance tests are reported to health departments and analyzed for outbreak detection. Design and methods: We conducted a qualitative study guided by a social ecological framework to identify perspectives on risks, concerns, and perceived benefits of MHE among communities affected by HIV and surveillance policies. From 2020 to 2021, we interviewed 41 participants from five participant groups: public health leaders/staff, HIV advocates/Community Based Organization (CBO) leaders, people living with HIV (PLWH), ethicists, and HIV care providers. We conducted a thematic analysis of the interview data, identifying key perceived risks, concerns, and benefits related to MHE. Results: Our analysis revealed that while MHE was largely viewed as beneficial across groups (including PLWH and HIV advocates/CBO leaders), significant risks, concerns, and uncertainties continue to be associated with the approach, including privacy and confidentiality issues, adverse impacts on HIV testing and care, and potential for criminalization and stigmatization of PLWH. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the ongoing need for meaningful community engagement and ongoing qualitative research on the practice of MHE among different community groups and social contexts to ensure the responsible use of this new surveillance tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.