Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41054570›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Predictive performance of clinical scores and survival outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis: a prospective longitudinal study at a tertiary medical centre in Ethiopia.

Girum Tesfaye Kiya, Zeleke Mekonnen, Elsah Tegene Asefa, Edosa Kejela, Edosa Tadasa, Esayas Kebede Gudina, Tilahun Yemane, Gemeda Abebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Girum Tesfaye KiyaSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Zeleke MekonnenSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Elsah Tegene AsefaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Edosa KejelaDepartment of Anesthesia, Jimma University, Jimma, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Edosa TadasaSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Esayas Kebede GudinaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Tilahun YemaneSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Gemeda AbebeSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Oromia, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical scores such as quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), early warning score (EWS), and universal vital assessment (UVA) are commonly used as screening and prognostic tools in sepsis. However, consistent findings across different regions and hospital settings remain limited. This study aims to evaluate the performance of these clinical scores and identify predictors of survival in septic adults admitted to the ICU. Methods: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted from October 10, 2023, to October 9, 2024, involving adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Clinical scores were calculated on the first, third, and fifth days of admission. Their performance in detecting sepsis, identifying culture-positive cases, and predicting mortality was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate survival probabilities, and a Cox proportional hazards model was applied to identify predictors of survival in sepsis patients. Results: Of the ICU-admitted patients, 148 (51.9%) were septic, and 54 (36.5%) of them died in the ICU. The modified early warning score (MEWS) showed good performance in identifying sepsis (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.61-0.73]) and culture-positive cases (AUC = 0.65; 95% CI [0.50-0.80]) on the day of admission. MEWS also performed better in predicting mortality on day five (AUC = 0.75; 95% CI [0.57-0.93]). Patients with sepsis had significantly lower survival probabilities than those without sepsis (log-rank test, Conclusion: The MEWS score outperformed other clinical scores in identifying sepsis, detecting culture-positive cases, and predicting mortality. Sepsis was associated with higher mortality, which decreased with increasing GCS scores. MEWS may support early identification of sepsis and mortality risk, and its use could help improve ICU survival through timely intervention.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessSepsisAdultAgedEarly Warning ScoreEthiopiaFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsKaplan-Meier EstimateLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Dysfunction ScoresPrognosisClinical scoresCritically illMortalityPredictionSepsis

Identifiers

PMID41054570
PMCPMC12497402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.