ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2025
Dietary Intervention Trial Design in Patients With an Ileoanal Pouch: Lessons From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Feeding Study.
Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary intake in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a cross-sectional comparative study.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2026Article
- Anatomical, physiological, and luminal adaptations occurring in an ileoanal pouch: opportunities for improving outcomes.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2026Review
- The Challenges of Performing Controlled Trials of Diet Therapies in Gastroenterology.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Dietary Intervention Trial Design in Patients With an Ileoanal Pouch: Lessons From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Feeding Study.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aims of this study were to assess the effects of a whole diet strategy, a Monash Pouch Diet (MPD), on pouch-related symptoms, inflammation, quality of life, and stool characteristics in a cohort of patients with symptomatic pouches and a history of pouchitis compared with a typical Australian pouch diet. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dietary feeding trial, patients with ileoanal pouches received either a Monash Pouch diet or a typical Australian diet for 7 weeks. Clinical scores (Pouch Disease Activity Index, PDAI), pouch symptoms, tolerability, fecal calprotectin, and quality of life were measured pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome consisted of the proportion of patients achieving symptomatic remission (clinical PDAI ≤ 2). Results: All patients on the MPD experienced worsening symptoms, and the trial was terminated early. The majority of the participants reported partial adherence (50%-80%) and poor tolerability (median: 40 mm). Quality of life outcomes were highly variable across dietary arms, and fecal indices showed no consistent trends related to diet. Conclusion: This double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dietary feeding trial failed to determine the effect of the Monash Pouch Diet on pouchitis but suggests that the design of dietary trials for pouch patients requires careful consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.