Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41054536›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Contribution of auditory distance cues to size constancy in perception and grasping in restricted viewing.

Chao Zheng, Gexiu Wang, Xiaoming Zhou, Jie Gao, Irene Sperandio, Melvyn A Goodale, Juan Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chao ZhengKey Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510631, China.
Gexiu WangKey Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510631, China.
Xiaoming ZhouKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics of Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics, School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China.
Jie GaoKey Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510631, China.
Irene SperandioDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, 38068 Rovereto, TN, Italy.
Melvyn A GoodaleWestern Institute for Neuroscience and the Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5C2, Canada.
Juan ChenKey Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510631, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When vision is restricted, proprioceptive distance cues fully restore size constancy for scaling grip aperture when grasping objects, despite only limited improvement in perceptual judgments of object size. This suggests that specific task demands and associated neural mechanisms determine the relative weighting of cues during multisensory integration. Is this specific to proprioceptive cues? Here, we examined the contribution of auditory information to perception and action systems under restricted viewing conditions. Surprisingly, in contrast to proprioception, providing auditory distance information had no impact whatsoever on size constancy in grasping but did improve perceptual judgments of size. After participants received extensive training in discriminating distance from auditory cues, there was a modest improvement in grip scaling. Taken together, we suggest that the neural mechanisms mediating grasping cannot incorporate distance information from audition as easily as they can from proprioception when computing real-world object size, but this ability can be improved with training.

Indexed as

Cognitive neuroscienceNeuroscienceSensory neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID41054536
PMCPMC12496167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.