Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41054494›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cognitive behavioral therapy2025

Elizabeth Hill, Kate Tonta, Mark Boyes, Courtenay Norbury, Sarah Griffiths, Shaun Goh, Brooke Ryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cognitive behavioral therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth HillCurtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4363-4962
Kate TontaCurtin enAble Institute, Curtin University, Northbridge, Australia.
Mark BoyesCurtin enAble Institute, Curtin University, Northbridge, Australia.
Courtenay NorburyUniversity College London Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, London, UK.
Sarah GriffithsUniversity College London Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, London, UK.
Shaun GohNanyang Technological University National Institute of Education, Singapore, Singapore.
Brooke RyanCurtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article addresses two crucial questions: what are the language demands of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), and how can CBT be more accessible to people with language difficulties? These questions are examined through a case study of Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). With approximately 7% of children living with DLD, mental health practitioners have inevitably encountered someone with this condition. Many children with behavioural and emotional problems have unidentified language difficulties, increasing their risk of mental health problems. Language is the medium through which CBT is delivered, so exploring its language-based accessibility is of critical concern. This paper (i) describes a language framework, (ii) identifies the language skills required for CBT engagement, and (iii) outlines strategies to improve language-based accessibility. These considerations are conceptualised in the context of DLD, yet they apply to any neurodivergent population with language needs who may benefit from CBT. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41811-025-00254-3.

Indexed as

AccessibilityCognitive behaviour therapyDevelopmental language disorderLanguage difficulties

Identifiers

PMID41054494
PMCPMC12496285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.