ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025
External Validation of Straticyte™, a Quantitative Biomarker-Based Risk Assay in Predicting Oral Cancer.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-Centre Prospective Community-Based Observational Study on Prediction of Malignant Progression of Clinically Suspicious Oral Lesions With STRATICYTE
Evaluation of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMDs) with STRATICYTE™
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Current management of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) based on dysplasia grading is controversial. The malignant transformation rate of OPMDs does not correlate well with dysplasia grading, resulting in non-standardized treatment for patients. A quantitative biomarker-based risk score (qBRS; trade name StraticyteTM) was previously developed to address shortcomings related to the current standard of care. A multicenter, retrospective cohort study consisting of biopsied OPMDs was used to validate qBRS for predicting transformation of OPMDs to OSCC. Materials & Methods: Three hundred and two cases were immunostained, imaged, and analyzed via qBRS. A binary prognostic risk was determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve optimizing sensitivity and specificity. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probability of lack of malignant transformation for patients with elevated or normal biomarker-based risk. Results: The results demonstrated very high sensitivity (96.2%) and negative predictive value (96.2%) for qBRS. Elevated risk scores had higher predicted probabilities of transformation to cancer, independent of dysplasia grade. Conclusions: qBRS can be a useful clinical adjunct tool to dysplasia grading for the assessment of malignant transformation potential, providing a quantitative metric in OPMDs. The addition of qBRS to current histological techniques should improve early detection rates of OSCC, enhancing the effectiveness of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.