ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025
Evaluation of Bifid Mandibular Canals with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Saudi Population: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of bifid mandibular canal (BMC) in the Saudi Arabian population by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: A retrospective study of patients who visited the maxillofacial surgery clinic and had CBCT scans taken for the full mandible was reviewed. A total of 258 images were scanned and 184 of those images were selected for analysis. Three examiners were trained and calibrated on detecting and classifying BMC by an oral and maxillofacial radiologist (OMFR) using CBCT images not included in this study. The examiners then reviewed the CBCT images for BMC. A classification Fisher's exact test was used to observe the association between BMC and the demographic characteristics of study subjects. Results: Only, three male subjects (1.6%) presented with BMC, all were type I. Two (66.7%) were unilateral BMC, and one (33.3%) was bilateral. There is no statistically significant association between the frequency of BMC and age groups or gender. Conclusion: The prevalence of BMC in the Saudi population is considered low. Potential errors in identifying BMC are related to grooving of the lingual nerve. Adequate imaging modalities and knowledge in anatomy are important to detect BMC to avoid complications in dental treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.