ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025
Comparative Evaluation of Bone Regeneration in Third Molar Extraction Using Simvastatin Powder And Simvastatin Gel-A Split-Mouth Study.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate and compare bone regeneration in third molar extraction using simvastatin powder and simvastatin gel. Materials and Methods: A randomized, split-mouth, single-blinded, single-center trial was performed in 10 patients requiring surgical extraction of bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars. Each participant was randomly assigned to receive Gelfoam soaked with drug simvastatin (10 mg) in one socket and simvastatin gel in other socket. RVG was taken after the first, fourth, eighth, and twelfth weeks after analyzing the gray mean scale value with a histogram to determine bone regeneration. On Day 1 and Day 7, pain and wound healing were measured using the VAS scale and the Landry et al. scale, respectively. Result: The paired t test was used to compare the two groups; individual means for both groups revealed a significant result, with the greatest mean appearing at the 12th week, suggesting that simvastatin usage aids bone regeneration. Conclusion: We recommend using simvastatin after every third molar operation since it aids in bone regeneration. Even though simvastatin gel is cost effective, it must be prepared fresh before use. Sustained release of simvastatin should be further investigated using different carrier methods that would prove to be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.