ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025
Efficacy of Topical Insulin Gel Dressing Versus Collagen Dressing in Treating Facial Soft Tissue Abrasions: A Split Face Clinical Study.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of topical insulin gel dressing versus collagen membrane dressing in managing facial soft tissue abrasions. Objectives: To formulate topical insulin gel and to assess and compare the efficacy of topical insulin gel and collagen dressings. Methods: A total of 52 patients with bilateral and multiple facial abrasions were included in this study. A split face design experimental study was conducted using topical insulin gel and collagen dressing. Rate of wound healing and epithelization, reduction of wound size and complications were assessed and compared among the two groups over a period of 21 days. Results: A statistically significant result was found in the insulin dressing site during initial days of wound healing. While both the dressing materials effectively reduced the wound size by 21 days, suggesting that both the dressing materials are effective in wound healing with minor differences in the initial response. Scarring was seen more in collagen dressing group compared to insulin gel group. Conclusion: Both the dressing materials were effective in reduction of wound size over the time but insulin gel dressings showed slightly superior quality of healing in terms of scar and texture when compared to other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.