Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41054457›Full record

ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025

Cutting Edge Era of Additively Manufactured Patient Specific Titanium Implants for Expeditious Extensive Cranioplasties.

Brigadier Priya Jeyaraj, Pradeep Kumar Yadav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brigadier Priya JeyarajArmed Forces Dental Clinic, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0182-5170
Pradeep Kumar YadavNew Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Reconstruction of a large central calvarial defect following decompressive craniectomy can be extremely complicated and challenging if the excised bone flap is either unsalvageable, or becomes infected during the course of its preservation, rendering it unusable for subsequent reconstruction. Bifrontal cranioplasty is further constrained by the necessity of accurately reproducing the precise morphology and contour of the forehead region, to restore the most prominently displayed part of a patient's face. Alloplastic materials such as Titanium meshes and Medpore implants are incapable of providing and maintaining the necessary shape and contour in this region, and further, lack the required rigidity and impact resistance to provide adequate protection to the underlying brain. They are also often plagued by failure from implant rejection, infection and exposure.Advent of the era of three-dimensional printing and additive manufacturing has revolutionised reconstructive surgery, by allowing replication and replacement of lost body structures, thus providing 'the next best thing' to the original. Material and Methods: We describe in detail the unparalleled flexibility, precision and efficiency of additive manufacturing technology in the creation of a customised patient specific cranial implant, using Grade-5 titanium (Ti6Al4V) alloy, to restore an extensive bilateral fronto-temporo-parietal calvarial bone defect in a young adult male. Results and Conclusion: The disfiguring and debilitating post-craniectomy defect was expeditiously and successfully reconstructed using an additively manufactured, state of the art, customised titanium PSI, employing three different 3D printing modalities and materials, in a successive and stage-wise manner, to create the host-bone replica, the implant prototype and lastly, the final implant. Furthermore, the virtual implant design and the fabricated implant were subjected to a series of analyses, namely, the finite element analysis and 'Gesellschaft Optische Mebtechnik' analysis, respectively, to ensure optimal quality, standardisation and precision of the final finished and polished product, thus yielding the best possible and profoundly gratifying post-cranioplasty results.

Indexed as

Additive manufacturingBilateral fronto-temporo-parietal (BFTP) calvarial defectFinite element analysis (FEA)Fused deposition modelling (FDM)“Gesellschaft Optische Mebtechnik”/geometric optical measurements (GOM)Patient specific implant (PSI)Selective laser sintering (SLS)Stereolithography (SLL)Three dimensional (3D printing)

Identifiers

PMID41054457
PMCPMC12496351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.