Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41054451›Full record

ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025

Finite Element Analysis of Titanium Plates for Unilateral Condylar Neck Fracture Fixation: A Computational Study.

Agalyah Kalyan Kumar, Pradeep Christopher, Mohamed Afradh, Vandana Shenoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Three-dimensional finite element analysis for internal fixation of mandibular condylar fractures: a scoping review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Agalyah Kalyan KumarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute (Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital), Chennai, India.
Pradeep ChristopherDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute (Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital), Chennai, India.
Mohamed AfradhDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute (Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital), Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9617-451X
Vandana ShenoyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute (Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital), Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Condylar neck fractures are challenging to treat owing to their intricate biomechanics, constrained accessibility, and narrow anatomical dimensions. This complexity hinders the precise placement of internal fixation devices and assurance of fracture stability. Despite various osteosynthesis devices, a lacuna persists regarding the effectiveness of these plates in stabilizing condylar neck fractures. This study compares the performance of five titanium osteosynthesis devices (single 4-hole Miniplate, Lambda, Trapezoidal, Rhomboidal, Alpha plates) in fixing unilateral condylar neck fractures using computational finite element analysis (FEA). Method: Mandibular model, derived from a CT scan, underwent virtual condylar neck fracture simulation. Osteosynthesis plate models were adapted to the fractured segments. Implementing FEA, each model was evaluated under two loading scenarios: (i) reduced post-operative bite force of 135 N and (ii) clenching masticatory force of 500 N. Analysed parameters encompassed stress on screws across different plates, displacements along the fracture line, bone strains on the screw portion, and stress on plates, implant deformation, and rigidity. Results: At 135N, all 5 plates offer an adequate fixation with a small risk of screw loosening for the rhomboidal and trapezoidal plates. For 500N, the lambda and alpha plates showed superior performance by evenly distributing strains within the bone, maintaining rigidity and reducing implant failure. Conclusion: Lambda and Alpha plates demonstrated superior performance under increased loads. Conversely, Trapezoidal and Rhomboidal plates are not advisable for condylar neck fractures, particularly when anticipating larger functional loads.

Indexed as

Condylar neckFinite element analysis (FEA)FractureOsteosynthesis plates

Identifiers

PMID41054451
PMCPMC12496311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.