Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41054426›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025

Reflecting on Students' Experiences with Innovative Teaching Models in Clinical Placement: A Qualitative Study.

Shaoting Feng, Daya Yang, Kunsong Zhang, Gang Yuan, Hao Tang, Denise Findlay, Adam R Thomas, Lewis S MacKinnon, Ming Kuang, Haipeng Xiao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shaoting Feng *First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Daya Yang *First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Kunsong Zhang *First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Gang YuanFirst Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hao TangFirst Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Denise FindlayCurtin Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Adam R ThomasCurtin Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Lewis S MacKinnonCurtin Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-8160-3801
Ming KuangFirst Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7397-5779
Haipeng XiaoFirst Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Dan XuFirst Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6649-1111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: General practice (GP) placement teaching can be challenging because of time constraints, ineffective teaching models, and a lack of consensus approaches. GP clinics are more frequently used for undergraduate students' learning to translate theoretical knowledge into clinical practice. Evidence suggests that a learner-centred approach is essential for facilitating deeper learning. "Student-led consultation under supervision" is one such learner-centred teaching model applied during GP placement, engaging both trainers and trainees in applying the core values of clinical thinking. This qualitative study intends to explore students' learning outcomes when implementing the innovative teaching model "Student-led consultation under supervision during GP clinical placement" for potential quantitative introduction as a formal GP placement curriculum. Methods: A convergent mixed-method approach was applied using validated surveys and pre-designed questionnaires for individual reflection when implementing innovative teaching models in medical students' GP placements. Thirty-five medical students from China and Australia participated in the study. Survey and reflection data were collected for descriptive and semantic analysis. Results: "Student-led consultation under supervision in a consultant's chair with discussion" was the students' most highly rated teaching model. Students' reflections on the use of these teaching models were semantically analysed using a validated questionnaire. The students' reflections highlighted the perceived academic benefits with identifying the enablers of and barriers to developing the formal GP placement curriculum. Conclusion: This study shows that "Student-led consultation under supervision in a consultant's chair with discussion" is innovative in GP teaching. The demonstrated innovation embraces the concept of cognitive apprenticeship for improving learning outcomes. These teaching models incorporate students' reflection in curriculum design and extend the definitions of "cognitive apprenticeship" and "transfer of learning" in modern clinical teaching to improve trainees' placement learning. The identified enablers of and barriers to implementing these innovative teaching models will pave the way for future studies to confirm the practicality of implementing them in real-life clinical practice.

Indexed as

action learningclinical educationclinical thinkingcognitive apprenticeshipgeneral practice placement teachinginnovative training methods

Identifiers

PMID41054426
PMCPMC12497361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.